NURE ALAM CHOWDHURY, A.K.SENGUPTA
TERAI TEA CO. PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KUMKUM MITTAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5/07/1993 passed by the Court of the first instance dismissing the application of the appellant, Terai Tea Company (P) Ltd. , for being added as a party defendant.
( 2 ) SHORTLY stated, the facts are that the Extra Ordinary Suit No. 1 of 1985 was instituted by Dhirendra Nath Bhowmick, since deceased, and Smt. Reba Bhowmick the respondent No. 3 herein challenging, inter alia, certain dealings and transactions allegedly entered into between them and some of the respondents herein, in respect of, inter alia, Dharanipur Tea Estate situate in the District of Jalpaiguri and for restoration of possession of the said tea estate. The suit was instituted in the Court of the Assistant District Judge, Jalpaiguri and was marked Title Suit No. 78 of 1984.
( 3 ) THE above suit was subsequently transferred to this Court from the Court of the Assistant District Judge, Jalpaiguri under Cl. 13 of the Letters Patent and was marked Extra Ordinary Suit No. 1 of 1985, (hereinafter referred to as the "transferred Suit" ).
( 4 ) IN or about March 1990, the appellant instituted a suit being No. 240 of 1990 (hereinafte
Shah Babulal Khimji v. Jayaben D. Dania
Shanti Kumar R. Canji v. Home Insurance Co. of New York
Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd. v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd.
Razia Begum v. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum
Deputy Commissioner, Hardoi v. Rama Krishna
REFERRED TO : Mohammadbhai Sk. Mohsinbhoy v. Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta
P. S. R. Sadhanantham v. Arunachalam
Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M. V. Dabholkar
Narayan Chandra Garai v. Matri Bhandar Pvt. Ltd.
Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.