SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 419

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. Narayana Pillai and E.K. Moidu, JJ.
Thomas
Versus
State of Kerala
Cr.A. No. 49 of 1973.
Decided On : 06 August 1973

Advocates:
A. Devi Nair, for Appellant.
State Prosecutor, for Respondent.

Evidentiary value of the statement given by the accused before the police.

Headnote:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898-Sections 154 and 162-Evidentiary value of First information report/ statement by the accused-Admissibility of statement given by the accused before the Police in course of investigation of the case.

       

Moidu, J.—The appellant has been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, to three months’ rigorous imprisonment under section 323. Indian Penal Code, and to four years’ rigorous imprisonment under section 326, Indian Penal Code. The conviction under section 302 was for causing the murder of one Joseph by the appellant stabbing him with M.O. 1 dagger and the conviction under section 323, Indian Penal Code, was for beating Joseph with his hands at about 7-30 p.m. on 18th April, 1972. The conviction under section 326, Indian Penal Code, was for causing grievous hurt to P.W.1 by stabbing him with M.O. 1 dagger at the same time and place. The sentences are to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution story was narrated as follows: Some dispute existed originally between P.W.5, a brother of deceased Joseph on the one hand, and P.W.7 a brother of the appellant’s brother in-law on the other, with regard to a transaction in paddy seeds. That dispute developed into enmity between the respective families of the appellant and deceased Joseph. While so a wordy altercation took place on the date of the incident near one Koomanthodu bridge between P.W.1 and deceased Joseph and the appellant. P.W.1 is the younger brother of deceased Joseph. They were on their way back home after sale of milk in the adjacent village. P.W.1 went walking a little ahead of Joseph when he met the appellant near the bridge. While they were engaged in some exchange of words Joseph came and disrupted the talk. Thereafter the appellant crossed the bridge and stood on the road on the other side. In the meanwhile Joseph walked through the channel and reached near the appellant when again there was a wordy quarrel between them during the course of which the appellant drew out M.O. 1 dagger intending to stab Joseph. But due to the timely intervention of P.W. 6, no untoward incident happened there. P.W.6 directed the appellant to go away from the place while he asked P.W.1 and Joseph to go home a little later. It was thereafter that the appellant went and stood in front of the house of deceased Joseph. The house of P.W.5, another brother of Joseph, was adjacent to it. When Joseph reached in front of his house, the appellant beat him first on his face with his hand and then stabbed him with M.O. 1 causing a penetrating injury on his left eye. By then P.W.1 came running to the spot and P.W. 5 accompanied by P.W. 2, wife, and P.W. 3, daughter of Joseph, also arrived at the scene hearing the cry of Joseph. As soon as the stab on the eye was inflicted Joseph had caught hold of the appellant. While so the appellant stabbed him again on his back with the result that he fell down. P.W. 1 then intervened when he too was stabbed on his back with M.O. 1. However, he was able to overpower the appellant by wresting M.O. 1 from him with the help of P.W.5. After getting M.O. 1 from him it was handed over to P.W.5 who in his turn handed it over to P.W. 2. While wresting M.O. 1 from the appellant, P.W.1 sustained two more injuries on his hands. Finally, they tied down the appellant with a rope. P.Ws. 4 and 6 came there later and saw the appellant lying tied down with a rope. But the appellant’s brother released him a little later.

3. Joseph and P.W.1 were removed to the Government Hospital, Cannanore, where P.W. 9, Assistant Surgeon, met Joseph at 12-45 a.m. and P.W.1 at 1-15 a.m. On their examination, Exhibit P-7 wound certificate was issued for the injuries of Joseph and Exhibit P-8 wound certificate for the injuries of P.W. 1. P.W.9 sent Exhibit P-11 intimation at 1-50 a.m. to the Town Police Station, Cannanore. On receipt of that intimation P.W. 12 Head Constable reached the hospital at 9-30 a.m. when he recorded Exhibit P-12 first information statement from Joseph who was lying as an in-patient at the hospital. Crime No. 153 of 1972 was registered against one Jose at the Cannanore Town Police Station on the basis of Exhibit P-12. First informa





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top