BASHEER AHMED SAYEED, P.RAJAGOPALAN
S. R. Narayana Ayyar – Appellant
Versus
Mavalathara Veerankutti – Respondent
The Madras City Civil Court Act (VII of 1892) was amended by Madras Act X of 1955. The main purpose of this Amending Act was to enhance the pecuniary jurisdiction of the City Civil Court from Rs. 10,000 up to Rs. 50,000. In consequence, section 8 of Madras Act X of 1955 enacted a transitory provision in the following terms:
“Transitory provision (1).- All suits pending in the High Court on the date of the commencement of this Act and which would be within the cognizance of the Madras City Civil Court under the provisions of this Act shall s tand transferred to the Madras City Civil Court”. By a further amending Act, Madras Act XXIX of 1955, this transitory provision was amended to read as follows:
“All suits pending in the High Court on the date of the commencement of this Act and which would be within the cognizance of the Madras City Civil Court under the provi
Official Assignee Madras v. Ranganathan : [1951] 2 M.L.J. 93
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.