KUPPUSWAMI AYYAR
Amritlal N. Shah – Appellant
Versus
V. Nageswara Rao – Respondent
This is a petition to revise the order of the Additional First Class Magistrate of Rajahmundry in M.C. No. 12 of 1944 dropping further proceedings under section 145(5), Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner had taken on lease the Hanuman Palace also called Amrit Talkies in Lakshmivarapetta at Rajamundry from the respondent and another, and he was in possession of the same till 9th September, 1944. The petitioner is a person who belonged to Bangalore and he had taken this building on lease for running cinema shows. The petitioner had taken a licence. Representing to the District Magistrate that under the terms of the lease the licence should be taken by him only in the name of the lessor, the lessor, the respondent, got the licence issued to himself, and a notice was also issued saying that the respondent was entitled to possession. The notice ran as if the District Magistrate had consulted the Government Pleader and had accepted his opinion. Accordingly, when the petitioner was absent his manager and others were sent out and the respondent went to the Talkies got possession of the property and began to run the show. The petitioner got information from his manager and other s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.