SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 3

SUBBA RAO
Lakshmi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Thangavel Asari – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S. Sankara Aiyar and V. Sundaresan for Appellants.
R. Ramamurthi Aiyar for Respondent.

Judgment.-

The Second Appeal raises a question of the interpretation of section 2 of the Hindu Widows’ Re-marriage Act (XV of 1856), hereafter called the Act, and its application to the facts of the case. The facts are simple and are not in dispute. They may be briefly stated. One Mookan Asari, the elder brother of the plaintiff and the first husband of the defendant died. After his death, the plaintiff instituted O.S. No. 239 of 1944 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif of Ambasamudram claiming that the properties were joint family properties and that he was entitled to the same by survivorship. The defendant contended that the properties were the separate properties of Mookan Asari and that she succeeded to the same as his widow. The suit was ultimately compromised and Exhibit A-6, dated nth June, 1945, was the compromise decree made therein. Under the compromise decree, the properties described in the first schedule annexed to that decree were given absolutely to the plaintiff and the properties particularised in the second schedule annexed thereto were given absolutely to the defendant. The plaintiff and the defendant were put in possession of the properties allotted



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top