V.DHANAPALAN
P. N. Chinnasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat – Respondent
1. As the issues and questions involved in these writ petitions are common and as they arise out of the same cause of action, they are taken up together for disposal and decided by a common order.
2. Heard Mr.S.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners; Mr.S.Gopinathan, learned Additional Government Pleader and Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the 1st respondent in W.P.No.12778 of 2010 and for the 1st and 2nd respondents in W.P.No.20304 of 2010; Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Government Advocate appearing for the 2nd respondent in W.P.No.12778 of 2010 and the 3rd respondent in W.P.No.20304 of 2010 and Mr.A.Mohammed Ismail, learned counsel appearing for respondents 3 to 11 in W.P.No.12778 of 2010.
3. Challenging the impugned notifications dated 07.06.2010 and 16.08.2010 passed by the Executive Officer, Periyanaickenpalayam Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Coimbatore, seeking to quash the same and for a direction to the respondents to renew the shops belonging to them for a further period of 3 years from 01.06.2010 to 30.06.2013 and from 01.09.2010 to 31.08.2013, respectively, by accepting 15% enhanced rent, the petitioners have filed the
6. AIR 2005 MADRAS 264 in the case of DCW Ltd. vs. The State of Tamil Nadu and others
8. Fernandez vs. State of Mysore
9. State of Maharashtra v. Lok Shikshan Sanstha
13. Nagendra Nath v. Commissioner
15. Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan (JT 2003 (6) SC 20 : (AIR 2003 SC 2889) (vide paragraph 42):
18. 2006 (5) CTC 236 in the case of C.Jayanthi vs. The Commissioner, Mettur Municipality, Mettur Dam
22. (1985) 3 SCC 267 in the case of Ram and Shyam Company vs. State of Haryana and others.
1. AIR 2000 Madras 393 in the case of Tamil Nadu Municipal Shop Merchants
5. 2005 (1) CTC 81 in the case of S.Selvarani vs. The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality
7. J.R.Raghupathy v. State of A.P. AIR 1988 SC 1681
10. Regina v. St. A.H.E. School
12. Abdulla Rowther v. S.T. A.T. (AIR 1959 SC 896) (vide para-11);
14. Abdullah Rowther v. S.T.A.T., AIR 1959 SC 896 (paragraphs - 11 & 18); Raman v. State of Madras
16. Mafatlal Industries Limited v. Union of India (1997 (89) ELT 247 SC);
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.