1. This Second appeal is focussed by the original defendant animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2007 passed in A.S.No.76 of 2006 by the First Additional District Court, Erode, reversing the judgment and decree of the first Additional Sub-Court, Erode in O.S.No.870 of 2003. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.

2. Narratively but precisely, broadly but briefly, the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this Second Appeal would run thus:

(a) The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note as against the defendant.

(b) The defendant filed the written statement resisting the suit denying the very signatures in the suit promissory note.

(c) Whereupon issues were framed by the trial Court.

(d) The plaintiff-Pushpa examined herself as P.W.1 along with P.Ws.2 and 3 and Exs.A1 to A5 were marked. The defendant-Chandramohan examined himself as D.W.1 along with D.Ws.2 and 3 and Exs.B1 to B9 were marked.

3. Ultimately the trial Court dismissed the suit as against which the plaintiff preferred appeal. Whereupon the appellate Court decr