K.MOHAN RAM, M.DURAISWAMY
S. Hymavathy – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkateswara Rao – Respondent
K.MOHAN RAM,J
1. The appellant in both the above appeals is the wife of the respondent.
2. The appellant filed O.P.No.1213 of 1997 against the respondent herein before the Principal Family Court, Chennai under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking a decree of divorce from the respondent on the ground of mental cruelty. Pending the aforesaid original petition, the respondent herein filed O.P.No.115 of 1999 before the same Court under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking restitution of conjugal rights on the ground that the wife – appellant herein had left the matrimonial home without any reasonable cause.
3. Before the Family Court, the appellant herein was examined as PW1 and she was cross examined by the respondent. The respondent/husband did not enter into the witness box. Except the marriage invitation card, which is marked as ExP1 by the appellant herein, no other documents have been marked on either side.
4. By an common order dated 2.9.2003, the Court below dismissed O.P.No.1213 of 1997 and allowed O.P.No.115 of 1999 and being aggrieved by that, the wife has filed the aforesaid two appeals. In O.P.No.1213 of 1997, the respondent filed I.A. No.12
1. Seth Ramdayal Jat V Laxmi Prasad {2009 (11) SCC 545}
2. Gautam Sarup V Leela Jetly (2008 (7) SCC 85)
3. Smt. Asha Handa V Baldev Raj Handa (AIR 1985 Del 76)
4. Badat and Co. V East India Trading Co. AIR 1964 SC 538
5. Suman Kapur V Sudhir Kapur (2009 (1) SCC 422)
6. Sirajmohmedkhan Janmohamadkhan V Hafizunnisa Yasinkhan (1981 (4) SCC 250 : 1981 SCC (Crl) 829)
9. Ashok Kumar Bhatnagar V Smt.Shabnam Bhagnagar {AIR 1989 Del 121 (1)}
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.