SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1883 Supreme(Mad) 90

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
C A Turner, Kt.
The Queen
Versus
Nachimuttu And Ors.
Decided On : 21 June, 1883

Labourers employed by the Government are not considered public servants under the Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:

Public Servant - Labourers - Interpretation of the definition of public servant under the Indian Penal Code

Fact of the Case:

Labourers employed by the Government were convicted under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the labourers were not officers and did not fall within the definition of public servant under the Indian Penal Code. The conviction under Section 353 was improper and should have been under Section 323.

Issues: Interpretation of the definition of public servant, proper application of relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code

Ratio Decidendi: Labourers employed by the Government are not considered officers and do not fall within the definition of public servant under the Indian Penal Code. The conviction should be based on the proper section of the Indian Penal Code.

Final Decision: The conviction under Section 353 was deemed improper and amended to be under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

JUDGMENT

Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.

1. Labourers or menial servants employed to do work or labour on account of the Government are not officers, and do not fall within the definition of public servant in the 21st section of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The conviction under Section 353 was improper. They should have been convicted under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The conviction will be amended accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top