SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Mad) 284

KRISHNAN
Donepudi Narasayya – Appellant
Versus
Chiguluri Venkiah – Respondent


ORDER

Krishnan, J.

1. This is an application to revise certain proceedings passed by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Masulipatam, in connection with an application filed by the petitioner asking the Magistrate to take action under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Magistrate stating that he was satisfied that there was a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace passed a preliminary order under Section 145 and directed the parties to attend his Court and to file written statements of their respective claims as regards the possession of the subject-matter in dispute. At a subsequent stage, the Magistrate, became satisfied that there was no likelihood of a breach of the peace and he, therefore, dropped the proceedings and passed no orders under Section 145 regarding possession of the property.

2. The first point taken before me in revision is that the Magistrate was not entitled to drop proceedings without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to show by evidence that there was a likelihood of the breach of the peace and the Magistrates conclusion that there was no likelihood of the breach of the peace from information received was incorrect. It is contended that, wit


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top