SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Mad) 603

RAMESAM
Adusumilli Gopalakrishnayya – Appellant
Versus
Adivi Lakshmana Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramesam, J.

1. If an appeal is presented/against a person who was dead at the date of presentation, the Court may, under Section 153, Civil Procedure Code, permit the cause-title to be amended or may return the appeal memorandum for amendment and representation. We think that the Bench which decided Govindu Kaviraj Purohito v. Gauranga Saw (1923) 45 MLJ 231. went too far in dismissing the second appeal as incompetent, and in declining to exercise its power of correcting, errors under Section 153, Civil Procedure Code. If the appeal memorandum is not allowed to be amended the party may apply for a refund of the spoilt stamp and may present a fresh appeal. In any case, the Court will, if the appeal is out of time against the legal representative, have to excuse the delay in presentation before it can proceed to hear the appeal.

2. Although the appeal may be incompetent owing to the wrong person being named as respondent, the Court which deals with it is acting in a proceeding in a suit and as such has full power under Section 153 to direct an amendment of the appeal memorandum.

3. As observed by Ramesam and Wallace, JJ. in C.M.P. No. 2807 of 1923 the question resolves itself int


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top