R.SUDHAKAR
D. Janaki – Appellant
Versus
S. Jayalakshmi – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred challenging the order and decreetal order dated 18.7.2011 passed in C.M.P.No.817 of 2011 in A.S.No.367 of 2010 on the file of the V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. Heard Mrs.V.Yamunadevi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. Defendant is the revision petitioner. The suit O.S.No.3522 of 2007 was filed on 14.6.2007 for recovery of money lent on a promissory note. In the trial Court, the respondent/plaintiff was examined as P.W.1 and marked Exs.A-1 to A-3 as follows:-
Ex.A-1 is the promissory note dated 1.4.2006,
Ex.A-2 is the Advocate notice issued by the plaintiffs counsel to the defendant and
Ex.A-3 is the postal acknowledgment card of the defendant.
On behalf of the revision petitioner/defendant, the defendant was examined as D.W.1 and Exs.B-1 to B-7 were marked and they are not relevant for the present issue. At the instance of the plaintiff, the court below examined one Mrs.Krishnakumari, Assistant of
E.S.I. Hospital and marked Ex.X-1 series (four in number), viz., attendance register at the office of the employer of the revisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.