G.RAJASURIA
P. Deivasigamani – Appellant
Versus
Asha Siraj – Respondent
1. Inveighing the order dated 5.2.2010 passed in I.A.No.37 of 2007 in O.S.No.6 of 2005 by the Additional District Court(Fast Track Court-II), Gobichettipalayam, this civil revision petition is focussed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, by filing the affidavit of service, would submit that the respondent and her advocate were served in person and despite that there is no response. As such, the learned counsel prays for orders on merits in this revision.
4. I could see considerable force in the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the civil revision petition itself is taken up for disposal at this stage itself.
5. The warp and woof of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition, would run thus:-
(i) The respondent herein filed the suit O.S.No.6 of 2005 seeking the following reliefs:
"to direct the defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.5,60,000/- with future interest at the rate of 1.5% per month from the date of suit till the date of realisation of the decree amount."
(ii) Whereupon written statement was filed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.