SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 894

K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
P. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Thamizhmani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.V. Venkataseshan for Appellant.
T.R. Rajaraman for Respondent.

Judgment :-

1. While C.M.S.A. No. 22 of 1991 is directed against the judgment of the District Court, North Arcot District in C.M.A. No. 4 of 1989, C.M.S.A. No. 23 of 1991 is directed against the judgment in C.M.A. No. 7 of 1989.

2. Both the said appeals before the District Court were filed by the opposite parties being the husband and wife not being satisfied with the order of the trial Court, Subordinate Judge, Vellore, in O.P. No. 53 of 1987. In the O.P. which was filed by the husband for divorce, the trial Court gave a decree for judicial separation. Both the husband and wife filed separate appeals and the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal filed by the husband and allowed the appeal filed by the wife and hence both the above Second Appeals by the husband aggrieved by the rejection of his petition for divorce.

3. In the petition for divorce, the petitioner/appellant herein contended that their marriage took place on 11.2.1976 and after the marriage, they were living together as husband and wife till January, 1982 and a male child was born who was eight years old. The petitioner was a Medical Graduate and a Child Health Specialist employed in the Government Primary Health Centre,














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top