S.S.SUBRAMANI
V. M. Subramani – Appellant
Versus
Arulmugu Bhavanarayanasamy Temple represented by its Trustees – Respondent
1. All these revisions are filed by defendant in the respective suits. Four suits were filed by respondents 1 to 5 herein for evicting the Defendant in the suit with arrears of rent.
2. It is alleged in the plaint that the property belonged to Arulmigu Bhavanarayanasami temple and the same was let out to defendants under rental arrangements. It is further stated that they are irregular in paying the rent. Notice was issued to defendants to settle the arrears and also to vacate the premises. The same was not complied with, which necessitated filing of the suits.
3. Revisions petitioners filed written statement denying the title of plaintiffs and alleged that some third parties are the real owners and they are paying rent to them.
4. After filing written statement, defendants filed an interim application before the court below to implead the third parties as additional parties to the suits. Those applications were dismissed by the court below which is challenged in this revision petitions.
5. Under O.1, Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, a person can be impleaded, who is found to be necessary or proper party. But, even while considering the application for impleadment obj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.