SRINIVASAN, J.

1. The appeal is against an order passed by a learned single judge of this Court on 14-11-1995 in O.A. No. 512 of 1995 in C.S. No. 637 of 1995 granting an injunction restraining the appellant from dealing with the first floor hall of the property mentioned in the Schedule to the application in any way detrimental to the benefit conferred on the plaintiff to have the meetings and conferences in the first floor hall. When the appeal was posted for admission on 20-12-1995, we ordered Notice of Motion returnable on 18-1-1996, and permitted the appellant to serve notice also privately on the party and the counsel on record for the respondent. The appellant has filed this application for review on 4-1-1996 contending that the procedure adopted by this Court is against law. According to the appellant, the appeal could have been either admitted or dismissed and that there is no provision in the Rules to order Notice of Motion to the respondent and giving him an opportunity to have a say in the matter of admission of the appeal.

2. Before this application was filed, the appellant sought to mention to another Bench to which one of us was a party and contend that the o