S.S.SUBRAMANI
Central Warehousing Corporation rep. by its Regional Manager – Appellant
Versus
Indersain Goyal – Respondent
1. All these revision petitions are filed by tenant, i.e., Central Warehousing Corporation, a Government of India Undertaking.
2. Three landlords filed R.C.O.P. 7, 8 and 9 of 1993 for evicting tenant on the following allegations:—
Landlord in R.C.O.P. 7 of 1993 is one Indersain Goyal. Other two eviction petitions were filed by his wife and sister. Reason for eviction is common.
3. Petitioner in R.C.O.P. 7 of 1993, i.e., Indersain Goyal is the Director of M/s. Tamil Nadu Steel Tubes Limited. Petitioner as well as his wife and sister purchased all these godowns, which are subject matter of these revision petitions under three sale deeds which stands in their individual names. It is the case of petitioner in R.C.O.P. 7 of 1993 that he has purchased scheduled premises i.e., Godown No. 9 for the use of the Company M/s. Tamil Nadu Steel Tubes Limited, which according to him is a family concern. In that family concern, he is the Director and substantial investment was made by the family members of the petitioner. It is said that all these godowns are required for the business of the Company since Company requires much volume of raw materials as well as finished products to be st
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.