1. The Appellants/Defendants have preferred the present Appeal as against the Judgment and decree dated 20.09.2002 in O.S.No.61 of 2001 on the file of Learned Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal.

2. On an appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record, the trial Court viz., Learned Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal while passing the Judgment in O.S.No.61 of 2001, dated 20.09.2002 has among other things observed that the Respondent/Plaintiff has aggrieved to undergo tubectomy operation on the assurance of the Third Appellant/Third Defendant that if the said operation is performed again the Respondent/Plaintiff will get beget a child and as such under the supervision of the Third Appellant/Third Defendant has undergone the Tubectomy operation and has also further observed that if the Third Appellant/Third Defendant under Medical Team has performed the operation on the Respondent/Plaintiff with care and caution then there is no possibility for the Respondent/Plaintiff to become pregnant and to deliver the child and therefore because of the Doctors carelessness and negligence the Respondent/Plaintiff has become pregnant and delivered a