SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 1190

V.KANAGARAJ
Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Valliammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mrs. Chitra Sampath, for M/s.T.R.Rajaraman, for Petitioner.
PPeppin Fernando, for Respondent.

Judgment :

1. This civil revision petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order dated 20.7.1998 made in E.A.No.32 of 1998 in E.P.No.79 of 1996 in O.S.No.346 of 1990 on the file of the Court of Principal District Munsif, Sivagangai.

2. In fact, the application in E.A.No.32 of 1998 was filed by the petitioner herein, under Sec.47 of the Code of Civil Procedure on averments that though he got impleaded as the second defendant to the suit in O.S.No.346 of 1990 filed by the respondent herein, he did not at all know about his impleadment and whatever that oc- curred in the suit: that one Meyyammal Aachi filed the suit in O.S.No.l 14 of 1971 against the respondent herein before the Court of District Munsif, Sivagangai and the said suit having been decreed, an application in E.P.No.291 of 1974 had been filed and the properties have been sold in court auction on 27.1.1976 and the successful bidder in this Court auction was one Kodhaiyammal for Rs.2,250 and thereafter as per the order passed in E.A.No.98 of 1976, dated 12.6.1976, delivery of possession of the said property had also been effected as a result of which, the said Kodhaiyammal became the absolute owner of the suit pr




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top