M. Venugopal, J.

The Appellant/Petitioner has filed these Writ Appeals as against the orders dated 11.12.2008 passed in W.P.Nos.10424 and 10425 of 2009.

2. The Learned single Judge while passing orders in W.P.Nos.10424 and 10425 of 1999 had among other things observed that The Tribunal recorded a clear finding that the Petitioner has caused loss to the Society and despite opportunities were granted, he has not submitted his explanation and was repeatedly taking adjournments and his defence was not accepted by the Tribunal. Even before this Court, the Petitioner had tried to contend elaborately that he was not responsible for the loss or that the procedure followed by him was the same as the earlier procedure followed by everyone, which cannot be accepted and found that there was no violation of the principles of natural justice or any perversity of finding by the Tribunal in confirming the order of the Deputy Registrar, etc., and further was not inclined to go into the merits of the case as if this Court was a further Appellate Authority constituted under the Act and resultantly, dismissed the writ petitions.

3. According to the Learned counsel for the Appellant/Writ Pet