SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 1999

PRABHA SRIDEVAN, P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA
Krishnagiri District Private Schools Association, – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel for V.P. Sengottuvel R. Muthukumarasamy, Senior Counsel for V.P. Sengottuvel N.R. Chandran, Senior Counsel for Paramasiva Doss K. Doraisami, Senior Counsel for M/s. Muthumani Doraisami S. Silambanan, Senior Counsel for M/s. Profex Associates S. Silambanan, Senior Counsel for K. Sathish S. Silambanan, Senior Counsel for S. Kalimuthu K. Venkatachalapathy, Senior Counsel for M. Sriram, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R1 & R2, P. Wilson, Addl. Advocate General-III Assisted by G. Sankaran, Spl. Govt. Pleader (Education), S. Naganathan, Addl. Govt. Pleader (Education) and Ms. Dakshayani Reddy, Govt. Advocate & R3, P.B. Suresh Babu, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Prabha Sridevan, J.

1. The "Samacheer Kalvi Thittam", i.e., The Uniform System of School Education Act, 2010 (Act 8 of 2010), hereinafter referred to as the Act, has been enacted to introduce a common syllabus, textbooks and examination system to the four streams of education in the State. According to the State, this will achieve social justice and introduce quality education; and it is for the benefit of the children. According to the writ petitioners, who are Matriculation Schools, this Act is unreasonable and not in the interest of the child. The most important persons, the children, were not there to express their views and so, with their best interests in mind, we have examined this issue.

2. The petitioners in most of the writ petitions are Private Schools Associations from various Districts, while some writ petitions are filed by individuals too. Only the Matriculation Schools contend that they are aggrieved. There is no challenge from the other two streams, viz. the Anglo-Indian Schools and the Oriental Schools. The grievance of the writ petitioners was expressed by learned senior counsel Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, Mr. N.R. Chandran, Mr. K. Doraisami, Mr. R. Muthuku






























































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top