SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2938

R.BANUMATHI
M. Baskaran, Gudiyatham – Appellant
Versus
M. Sabathy, Vellore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. Rajagopal, for Petitioner.
A. Anbarasu, for Respondent.

Judgment :

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against theorder dated 4.2.2005 in E. A. No. 226 of 2004 in EP. No. 301 of 2004 in O. S. No. 134 of 1999 passed by the District Munsif, Gudiyatham, Vellore District, dismissing the Petitionfiled under Section 47 C. P. C. The defendant is the revision petitioner.

2. O.S.No.134 of 1999 was filed by the plaintiff for declaration of his title over the suit property and for delivery of possession and for rendition of accounts for the second item of the property. Accordingto the plaintiff, he had put up a construction in the river poromboke and is in possession of the entire 75’ x 25’ river poromboke, which is forming backyard of hishouse in the second item of the property. The defendant resisted the suit contending thatthe Plaintiff being his elder brother has allowed the defendant to construct a house in the suit properties and enjoy the same for himself and the defendant had discharged all the loans of the plaintiff.

3. In consideration of the evidence adduced by the parties, after full trial, the trial Court/Subordinate Court, Vellore decreed the Suit on 25.3.2002 and ordered delivery of possession. As against that Judgment, no appe




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top