R.SUDHAKAR
S. Manoharan – Appellant
Versus
T. Mayakkannan – Respondent
The plaintiff has filed the revision petition challenging the order dated 28.08.2007 made in I.A.No.266 of 2007 in O.S.No.128 of 2005, on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, No.2, Madurai.
2. The brief facts of the case of the revision petitioner are as follows:
The revision petitioner filed the suit praying for decree:
1.By declaring one of the defendants is a real owner/landlord of the suit “A” Schedule building, entitled to receive the rent from the plaintiff and in consequence to restrain the defendants from in any manner evicting the plaintiff without determining the ownership of the property.
2. Direct the defendants to pay the costs of this action.
3. Such and further relives as this Honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case.
It is specifically pleaded by the revision petitioner/plaintiff that he is willing to pay the rent to the rightful owner to be determined by the Court viz. first defendant or second defendant. The suit, therefore, was filed. A written statement was filed by the first respondent/Second Defendant denying the plea in the plaint. The first respondent/defendant has also filed I.A.No.266 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.