High Court of Judicature at Madras
M.Y. EQBAL & T.S. SIVAGNANAM
P. Pugalenthi
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Chief Secretary to Government Secretariat & Another
W.P.Nos.7520, 7633 & 7634 of 2012
Decided on: 26-03-2012
Section 144 CrPC - Public Interest Litigation - 144(1), 144(5), 144(6)
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitions challenged the Prohibitory Order under Section 144 CrPC, clamped on Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District, preventing people from moving freely and essential supplies being denied. The District Collector justified the order as a preventive measure against anti-social elements and agitators against the Atomic Power Plant.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Prohibitory Order was specific and not a vague order preventing anyone from entering the Taluk. It held that the order was in compliance with Section 144(1) CrPC and that the petitioners were not persons aggrieved to question the manner of service of the order. The Court also noted that the order was only a regulation and not a prohibition altogether for avoiding breach of peace.
Issues: Whether the Prohibitory Order under Section 144 CrPC was justified and whether it could be questioned in a public interest litigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court referred to the urgency of the situation and the need for immediate prevention or speedy remedy as essential for invoking the power under Section 144 CrPC. It emphasized that the order must be in writing, stating the material facts and reasons for imposition of such restriction. The Court also highlighted the availability of remedies under Section 144(5) and 144(6) CrPC for persons aggrieved by the order.
Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed, and the Court held that the Prohibitory Order was justified and not a vague order. It directed the District Administration to ensure uninterrupted supply of essential commodities and bus facilities and to take action against persons indulging in activities obstructing access to the area.
Common Order
Chief Justice & T.S.Sivagnanam, J.
1. These writ petitions designed as 'Public interest litigation' have been filed, praying for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring the action of the respondent, namely, the District Collector, Tirunelveli District, clamping an order under Section 144 CrPC, on the entire Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District from 3.00 p.m of 19.03.2012 till 3.00 p.m of 02.04.2012 as being null and void and for a consequential direction to restore normalcy to the Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District and in particular Idinthakarai.
2. The petitioners have stated that "The Hindu" dated 20.03.2012, reported that a Prohibitory Order under Section 144 CrPC was clamped on Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District and the Taluk comprises of about 50 villages and by virtue of such order, the people residing in those villages have been virtually under house arrest and therefore, a direction has been sought for immediately to lift the Prohibitory Order passed under Section 144 CrPC and allow the people of Radhapuram Taluk to move freely.
3. Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the District Collector in the guise of exercising his power for maintaining public peace and tranquillity, deprived the people of Radhapuram Taluk of their basic and fundamental right to move freely from one place to another. Further, it is submitted that no material whatsoever was disclosed explaining the necessity of imposing this unreasonable restriction. There is no reason whatsoever, why a Prohibitory Order should be passed for the entire Taluk. The learned counsel after referring to Section 144 CrPC, submitted that none of the grounds mentioned under Sub-Section (1) Section 144 have been satisfied and no material has been placed before the District Collector to arrive at such satisfaction and no untoward incident has been reported in the past eight months when protests have been going on against the commissioning of the Atomic Power Plant at Koodankulam and the order has been promulgated on the same evening after the Cabinet of the State Government took a decision. It is further submitted that the procedure contemplated under Section 134 CrPC as regards service or notification of the order has not been followed and the order passed under Section 144 CrPC has not been made available to the people and has not been affixed in the area and therefore, there is a serious procedural violation which itself would be sufficient to revoke the order. The learned counsel placed reliance on the decision of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Madhu Limaye vs. S.D.M.Monghyr, AIR 1971 SC 2486 and submitted that for action under Section 144 CrPC, there should be urgency of the situation and the emergency must be sudden and the consequences sufficiently grave and it is submitted that all these aspects are not present warranting passing of the impugned order. The learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Gulam Abbas vs. State of U.P., AIR 1981 SC 2198, and submitted that the power under Section 144 CrPC is intended for preventing disorders, obstructions etc., and such power is conferred on the Executive Magistrate to perform the function effectively during emergency situation and there is no such emergency situation in Radhapuram Taluk warranting promulgation of an order under Section 144 CrPC.
4. Mr.N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the other writ petitioner submitted that the place where the protest is being held, is situated about 15 k.ms. away from the Atomic Plant and there is no reason as to why the entire village should be barricaded and the people of the area have been deprived of the essential commodities such as milk, water, electricity and the children are unable to commute to the School to attend the examination, since public transport has been cut off. It is further submitted that any order under Section 144 CrPC is subject to
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.