1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent.

2. The Review Application has been filed by the petitioners, to review the order passed by this Court, on 9.3.2010, in C.R.P.(PD)No.568 of 2009. This Court had passed the order, dated 9.3.2010, in C.R.P.(PD)No.568 of 2009, dismissing the Civil Revision Petition filed by the petitioners against the order, dated 2.4.2008, made in I.A.No.650 of 2004, in O.S.No.132 of 2004, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharapuram.

3. This Court had passed the order, dated 9.3.2010, dismissing the Civil Revision Petition. Paragraphs 12 and 13 of the said order read as follows:

"12. Even though this Court, by its order, dated 13.11.2007, made in C.R.P.No.2742 of 2007, had remanded the matter back to the trial Court, after setting aside the order, dated 10.7.2007, made in I.A.No.650 of 2004, to consider the evidence of one ‘Subbathal’ and to pass orders, afresh, on merits and in accordance with law, the trial Court had found that no evidence had been let in by a witness in the name of 'Subbathal'. Even though the petitioners had claimed that, due to a clerical er