S.MANIKUMAR
G. Pandi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Hosur Municipality – Respondent
1. Temple, constructed in a place earmarked for a park under a Scheme, is being used as a shield, against the law of encroachment.
2. Petitioner has sought for a mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachments made in Plot No.290A, Avvai Nagar, (New ASTC HUDCO), Hosur635 109, Dharmapuri District by the 3rd respondent or any other person and retain the above said plot as park as per the site plan of Tamilnadu Housing Board, Hosur Housing Unit approved by the Director of Town and Country Planning.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the Housing Board acquired lands in large scales for execution of various housing schemes in and around Hosur. One such scheme was called as 'New ASTC Hudco' Scheme, named as "Avvai Nagar". Plots were developed by the Tamilnadu Housing Board, Hosur, Dharmapuri District. Upon consideration of applications for allotment of houses, either under the outright purchase scheme or Hire Purchase Scheme, plots were allotted.
4. The petitioner has preferred an application on 06.11.1987 for allotment of L.I.G. House and a plot bearing No.261 in New A.S.T.C. Hudco scheme, was allotted to the petitioner, vide proceedings No.R5/1180
Sri Devi Nagar Residences Welfare Association V Subbathal 2007 (3) LW 259
Pt.Chetna Ram Vashist v Municipal Corporation of Delhi 1995 (1) SCC 47
State of Bombay v R.S.Nanji AIR 1956 SC 294
Alamunagar Residents Welfare Association V State of Tamil Nada 2010 (4) LW 76 (1995) 1 SCC 47
Chetna Ram Vashist v Municipal Corporation of Delhi 1995 (1) SCC 47
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.