SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(SC) 35

M. PATANJALI SASTRI, N. CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, M. C. MAHAJAN, B. K. MUKHERJEE, S. R. DASS
State Of Bihar: Visheshwar Rao: Surya Pal Singh: Headnote In State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Kameshwar Singh: State Of M. P. : Government Of U. P. : Kameshwar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
ALLADI KRISHNASVAMI IYER, B.R.AMBEDKAR, B.SEN, B.SOMALAYA, BISHAN SINGH, C.P.LAL, G.N.Joshi, GANPAT RAI, GOPALJI MEHROTRA, I.M.SHROFF, J.C.SINHA, K.B.ASTHANA, KANHIYA LAL MISHRA, LAKSHMI SARAN SINHA, LAL NARAIN SINGH, LAL NARAIN SINHA, M.C.SETALVAD, M.M.JOHN, M.S.K.Shastri, MAHABIR PRASAD, N.P.ASTHANA, N.S.BINDRA, NANAK CHAND GUPTA, NAUNIT LAL, P.A.Mehta, P.K.CHATTERJI, P.R.DAS, P.S.SAFIR, PREM MOHAN VARMA, R.C.Prasad, R.S.NARULA, RAGHOSARAN LAL, RAJENDER NARAIN, ROY PARAS NATH, S.C.MAJUMDER, S.K.DAS GUPTA, S.K.KAPOOR, S.MUSTAFI, S.N.MUKHERJEE, S.P.Varma, S.S.SHUKLA, SANJIB CHAUDHRY, SUKUMAR GHOSH, T.L.SHEDVE, T.P.Naik, URUKRAMDAS CHAKRAVARTHY, V.N.SVAMI, V.N.SWAMI

Judgment

PATANJALI SASTRI, C.J.I. : These appeals and petitions which fall into three groups, raise the issue of the constitutional validity of three State enactments called

The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act 30 of 1950).

The Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (No. 1 of 1951), and

The Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (U. P. Act No. 1 of 1951). (hereinafter referred to as the Bihar Act, the Madhya Pradesh Act and the Uttar Pradesh Act, respectively). The common aim of these statutes, generally speaking, is to abolish zamindaries and other proprietary estates and tenures in the three States aforesaid, so as to eliminate the intermediaries by means of compulsory acquisition of their rights and interests, and to bring the raiyats and other occupants of lands in those areas into direct relation with the Government. The constitutionality of these Acts having been challenged in the respective State High Courts on various grounds, the Bihar Act was declared unconstitutional and void on the ground that it contravened Art. 14 of the Constitution, the other grounds of attack being rejected, while the oth


















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top