SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 4112

M.M.SUNDRESH, P.JYOTHIMANI
New Kattalai Canal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.R.Murugesan, M.Rajeshwari, S.Sivasubramaniam, P.Wilson, Arul Vadivel

JUDGMENT

M.M. SUNDRESH, J.

( 1. )

1.1. The government of India has undertaken the project of providing a Bye pass to Trichy with a view to improve the infrastructure for agricultural, industrial, educational, health and socio-economic advancement in and around Trichy. The project of Tiruchirappalli ? Karaikudi Section of NH-210 from Km.10/000 to Km.94/000 including Trichy Bye pass on NH-67 from Km.110/016 to Km.135/930 was designed and restructured as two-lane with paved shoulders. 1.2. For the above said purpose, an alignment is required for Trichy Bye pass which starts near Thuvakudi village at Km.110/016 of NH-67 and intersects at Panchapur village at Km.135/930 at NH-45B. The said Bye pass road passes through Thuvakudi, Palanganakudi, Ilandaipatti, Kandalur, Sooriyur and Kumbakudi ? Velayuthangudi, Olaiyur, K.Sathanur South and K. Sathanur North villages of Tiruchirappalli District. The alignment also passes through Mathur, Signathakurichi and Kumaramangalam villages of Pudukottai District. Apart from the same, the alignment also passes through the Periyakulam and Kanakkankulam tanks of Sathanur village. 1.3. The Bye pass road after completion would facilitate to connect the foll
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top