1. Tenant is the revision petitioner.

2. The landlord/respondent filed application for eviction and the tenant/revision petitioner marked Ex.R1 and thereafter, the landlord filed application to reject Ex.R1 stating that Ex.R1 consists of two documents and the first document is properly valued and stamped and the second document is a supplementary lease agreement and that document is not duly stamped and unregistered one and therefore, that document cannot be marked in evidence and therefore, the said document has to be rejected. That petition was allowed and the revision petitioner was directed to pay stamp duty penalty for the second document viz., not duly stamped and unregistered document and that was challenged in appeal and the appellate authority modified the order and directed to send the supplementary lease deed to the office for fixation of stamp duty and after fixation of the stamp duty by the office if the tenant failed to pay stamp duty thereafter, the Trial Court has to impound the supplementary lease deed and forward the same to the Collector and that order is challenged in this revision.

3. Mr. P.B. Ramanujam, learned counsel for the revision petitioner su