SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 1252

A.RAMAMURTHI
Kannammal – Appellant
Versus
Mannammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Valliappan, for Appellants
T.R. Rajaraman, for Respondents

JUDGMENT

The unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S.No.383 of 1986 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai, have preferred the second appeal, aggrieved against the judgment and decree dated 16.12.1999 on the file of the District Court, Tiruvannamalai, partly allowing the judgment and decree dated 21.4.1999 made in O.S.No.383 of 1986.

2. The case in brief is as follows: The plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction. The suit property originally belonged to Tirumalai Reddiar, the father of the plaintiffs and it was his ancestral property. Out of love and affection, Tirumalai Reddiar executed a registered settlement deed in favour of the plaintiffs. The settlement deed was duly executed, attested and registered. The plaintiffs also accepted the settlement deed and they were put in possession and enjoyment of the property. Patta was also transferred in their name and they paid kist. The portion originally belonged to the plaintiffs’ father was purchased by the defendants 1 and 3. The defendants are the Pangalies of the plaintiffs. The defendants were expecting that they would inherit the property of Tirumalai Reddiar, but now, after realising that the property has b




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top