R.BANUMATHI, R.MALA
R. Mohanasundaram – Appellant
Versus
Arulmigu Kolavizhi Amman Temple – Respondent
R. BANUMATHI, J.
1. Being aggrieved by judgment dated 20.2.2008 decreeing the Suit – C.S. No. 914 of 1989 filed by the 1st respondent/ plaintiff directing the defendants to deliver possession of the suit property, defendants 3, 4 (appellants 1 and 2) and 43 to 45 (appellants 3 to 5) have preferred this appeal.
2. The suit property in S. Nos. 2364/1 and 2364/2 measuring 22 grounds and 282 sq.ft. In Pidariyar Koil Street, Gopathy Narayanaswamy Chetty Street, Mylapore, Chennai belongs to plaintiff temple – Arulmigu Kolavizhiamman temple. The present case is a typical case as to how the Poojaris (Archagars), who came in for performing poojas and as in-charge of the temple seek to claim right of ownership in the vast extent of very valuable property of the temple as their private land. In the earlier proceedings before the Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner, the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, the appellants have fought out making a claim that the temple is their private temple and were also unsuccessful in the subsequent proceedings claiming themselves as hereditary trustees. The appellants and their ancestors, who claimed to be in possession of the temple properties
7) In Venkata Narasimha Charyulu Peddinti v. Rayasam Gangamma Pantulu and Others, AIR 1954 Mad 258
1) Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy, (2008) 4 SCC 594 : LNIND 2008 SC 748 : (2009) 1 MLJ 1001
4) In Padmanabha Bhatta and Others v. H. Ramachandra Rao and Others
5) In Venkatadri v. Seshacharyulu, AIR 1948 Mad 72 : (1947) 1 MLJ 287
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.