M.VENUGOPAL
M. Ashokan – Appellant
Versus
M. Dhanasekara Pandian (died) – Respondent
The civil revision petitioner/appellant/respondent/tenant has preferred this civil revision petition as against the order dated 21.8.2008 in R.C.A. No. 63 of 2006 passed by the Rent Control Authority viz., the learned Principal Sub Judge, Madurai in confirming the order passed in R.C.O.P. No. 38 of 2003 dated 22.6.2006 passed by the learned Rent Controller viz., the learned District Munsif, Madurai Taluk ordering eviction on the ground of demolition and reconstruction of the premises.
2. The deceased respondent/petitioner/landlord filed petition R.C.O.P. No. 38 of 2003 before the learned Rent Controller, Madurai viz., learned District Munsif, Madurai Taluk under Sections 10(2)(ii)(a), 10(2)(ii)(b) and 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the revision petitioner/tenant praying for an order directing the revision petitioner/tenant to fact and deliver possession of the petition mentioned building with costs. Later on the demise of the respondent/landlord, respondents 2 and 3 have been impleaded as Legal Representatives of the original deceased landlord as per order in I.A. No. 201 of 2000 dated 7.3.2001.
3. After contest, the learned Rent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.