T.MATHIVANAN
R. Sarala – Appellant
Versus
Chandrasekar – Respondent
1. This review application is directed against the Judgment dated 23.09.2008 and made in A.S.No.1040 of 2004 on the file of this Court.
2. The review applicant is the first respondent in the appeal in A.S.No.1040 of 2004 and the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.2550 of 1999, on the file of the learned III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. The respondents 1 and 2 herein are the appellants in the appeal and the defendants 1 and 2 in the suit. The third respondent herein is the second respondent in the appeal and the third defendant in the suit.
3. The facts, which are absolutely necessary for the disposal of the review application are as under:
3.1.The review applicant has filed the suit in O.S.No.2550 of 1999 against the respondents herein for the following reliefs:
a. for dividing the schedule mentioned property into four equal shares by metes and bounds and allotting 1/4th share to the plaintiff;
b. for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men etc.,from alienating or encumbering the suit property of her 1/4th share; and
c. for costs.
3.2. One Mrs.Sundaravalli, who is none other than the mother of the review applicant and the respondents had inherite
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.