1. This revision is filed against the order of dismissal of the discharge petition, passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.I, Egmore, Chennai in M.P.No.1914 of 2007 in E.O.C.C.No.179 of 1985 dated 07.08.2007.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would contend that the petitioner has been falsely and unnecessarily implicated in the case and that she has no nexus, but, for the fact that she is the wife of the first accused. He would further contend that in this case, even according to the complaint itself barring one allegation of encashment of a cheque for a sum of Rs.3,690/- from a fictitious person, there is no other allegation as against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would further contend that, earlier the petitioner filed a petition to discharge, but it was dismissed and against that, a revision was preferred before this Court and that was also dismissed, but subsequently, the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that there is an assessment order pertaining to the year 1984-85 which is the relevant year for the complaint made by the Income Tax Authority and becau