SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 617

CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, R.KARUPPIAH
M. Arumugam – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Wilson, S.C. for A. Selvendran, R. Shanmugasundaram, S.C. for L. Baskar, V. Raghavachari, C.R. Prasannan, C. Prakasam, V. Ravi, D. Krishnakumar, N. Manokaran, R. Neelakantan, M. Sriram, H. Dhandapani, G. Ethirajulu, S.N. Ravichandran, P. Ganesan, P. Vijendran, P. Subramaniam, M.A.P. Thangavel, R. Karthikeyan, R. Jayaprakash, S. Dhanasekaran, V. Sivakumar, M. Babu Muthumeeran, N. Ramesh, Thiruneelakandan, V. Bharathidasan, T. Murugamanickam, S. Doraisamy, K.H. Ravikumar, S. Sathishrajan, M.V. Deenadayalan, S. Parthasarathy, R. Krishnaswamy, E.C. Ramesh, S. Raja, R. Devaraj, R. Thamaraiselvan, Advocates.
For the Respondents:A. Navaneetha Krishnan, Advocate General, Assisted by L.P. Shanmuga Sundaram, Special Govt. Pleader (Co-op.), Mrs. P. Rajalakshmi, Govt. Advocate, Mrs. T.P. Savitha, Govt. Advocate, E.M.S. Natarajan, Govt. Advocate, R6, E.R.A. Premnath, R. Rajendra Narasimhan, R4, K.V. Dhanapalan, N. Roofas Abraham, P. Gunasekaran, P. Chinnadurai, M. Dig Vijaya Pandian, R.Sivakumar, H.E. Raniselvan, D. Raja, S. Pasapatheswara, D. Suriyanarayanan, C. Munusamy for M/s. C&K Law Firm, D. Muruganathan, P.H. Aravindh Pandian, Addl. Advocate General Assisted by R. Bala Ramesh, Addl. Govt. Pleader (Coop.), L. Mahindran, Govt. Advocate, S. Gowtham Siva Sankar, Govt. Advocate, R2, M.S. Palaniswamy, R3, P.S. Sivashanmuga Sundaram, R. Venkatavarathan, R5, R. Sivakumar, E.M.S. Natarajan, Advocates.

ORDER

Chitra Venkataraman, J.

1. The batch of Writ Petitions before this Court are filed by the members of different Cooperative Societies seeking a Writ of Declaration to declare the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies (Third Amendment) Ordinance 2012, as unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution, particularly Part IXB of the Constitution of India. Subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petitions, the Ordinance had become an Act and accordingly, the petitioners have filed petitions before this Court, amending the prayer to declare the amended Act as unconstitutional. Accordingly, the amendment petitions filed in the Writ Petitions are ordered. On notice, the State has filed a common counter in all these Writ Petitions.

2. It is a matter of record that approximately for about 11 years, there had been no election in the Co-operative Societies for some reason or other to elect the members of the Board of Directors/Governing Body of the cooperative societies. In the wake of the above-said fact, in the place of the Board/governing body, Special Officers were appointed by the Registrar for a specified period not exceeding six months, to manage the affairs of the reg

























































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top