SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 78

V.RATNAM
N. Devarajan – Appellant
Versus
D. V. Munirathanam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T. P. Sankaran, S. Sureshkumar and G. Akbar Ali, for Petitioner.
Lakshmanan and Alagappan, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT:—

The tenant in H. R. C. No. 2963 of 1977, XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, is the petitioner in this civil revision petition. That application was filed by one Kannappan against the petitioner herein under section 10 (i) (2) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act XVIII of 1960 as amended by Act XXIII of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) praying for an order of eviction on the ground that the petitioner has committed wilful default in the payment of the monthly rent of Rs. 170 for the period from 1st March, 1975 to 31st August, 1977. The petitioner resisted that application contending that the rents for the period March to July, 1975 was paid and received by Kannappan, but that receipts were not issued and when the rent for the month of August, 1975 was tendered by the petitioner, Kannappan refused to receive the same and thereafter, the rents had been sent by the petitioner regularly by money order from August, 1975 upto date and those money orders had been unlawfully refused to be received by Kannappan. The petitioner, therefore, claimed that he did not commit any wilful default in the payment of rents.

2. Before the Rent Controller (XII















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top