SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 1343

G.RAJASURIA
N. Raman – Appellant
Versus
P. Sivalingam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:PA. Kadirvel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. This Second appeal is focused by the plaintiff animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2012 passed in A.S.No.23 of 2011 by the Principal Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai, reversing the judgment and decree of the Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai in O.S.No.177 of 2009.

2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.

3. A summation and summarisation of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Second Appeal would run thus:

(a) The appellant, who is the plaintiff, filed the suit for permanent injunction seeking the following reliefs, describing the schedule of property as under:

"(i) To grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any manner interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property for ever; and

(ii) For costs." (extracted as such)

SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY

Tiruvannamalai R.D., Sub-D-I, Tiruvannamalai Taluk,At Vellanandal Village

01. New S.No.51/6 (old S.No.37/8) 0.02.0 hectare including a well and the oil engine fitted in the well." on the main ground that the suit property belongs to the plaintiff exclus














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top