1. Defendants in O.S.No.15 of 2011 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Pondicherry are the revision petitioners.

2. Respondents filed the suit under section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for removal of the present Trustees viz., revision petitioners 2 to 6, appointing new trustees who have firm faith in the philosophy of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, settling a scheme for the administration of Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust, for formulating a court supervised process to be instituted to look into inter alia, to take steps to ensure withdrawal of the book and to take systemic corrective steps to ensure that such blatant violation of the trust's objectives do not repeat themselves. They also filed I.A.No.474 of 2010 to seek leave of the court to institute the suit and after hearing the revision petitioners herein, an order was passed in I.A.No.474 of 2010 granting the leave and the same was challenged in C.R.P. PD No.949 of 2011 before this court and this court dismissed the revision holding that the grant of leave by filing the suit is an administrative act against which no revision will lie and also observed that the revision petitioners can file an