G.Rajasuria
Dhanalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Karuppusamy – Respondent
1. This second appeal is filed by the plaintiff animadverting upon the judgement and decree dated 4.1.2010 passed by the Additional District Court/Fast Track Court No. II, Gobichettipalayam, confirming the judgement and decree dated 28.8.2008 passed by the First Additional Sub-Court Gobichetti- palayam, in O.S. No. 110 of 2002, which is one for partition.
2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.
3. The warp and woof of the gername fact absolutely necessary for the disposal of this second appeal would run thus:
(i) The original deceased plaintiff-Karupayal filed the suit for partition as against her son-D1-Ponnusamy and D2-Karuppusamy-the purchaser of suit property from D1-Ponnusamy.
(ii) The gist and kernel of the averments in the plaint would be to the effect that the suit property originally belonged to Palanisamy-the husband of Karupayal and father of D1-Ponnusamy. The said Palanisamy died intestate during the year 1995; whereupon, his wife Karupayal and son-Ponnusamy became the class-I heirs, entitled to equal shares in the suit property.
(iii) While so, D1-Ponnusamy disreg
J.Mathew (died) 2. J.Damien v. Leela Joseph (2007) 3 LW 916 [Para 23(xii)]
Asber Reuben Samson v. Eillah Solomon AIR 1991 Bom. 148 [Para 23(viii)]
Bhagat Ram v. Suresh (2003) 12 SCC 35 [Para 23(2)]
Bhagwan Kaur v. Kartar Kaur (1994) 5 SCC 135 [Para 23(1)]
Daulat Ram v. Sodha (2005) 1 SCC 40 [Para 23(i)]
Indu Bala Bose v. Manindra Chandra Bose AIR 1982 SC 133 [Para 23(vi)]
Janaki Devi v. R. Vasanthi (2005) 1 LW 455 [Para 23(iv)]
Kalyan Singh, London Trained Cutter, Johri Bazar
M. Anandan v. A. Dakshinamoorthy (2008) 2 MLJ 119 [Para 23(ix)]
M. Krishnan v. Ramaswami (1984) 2 MLJ 133 [Para 23(xvii)]
Meenakshiammal (Dead) through LRs. v. Chandrasekaran (2005) 1 SCC 280 [Para 23(ii)]
Nagarajan v. Annammal (1989) 1 LW 396 [Para 23(v)]
Ram Piari v. Bhagwant (1990) 3 SCC 364 [Para 23(xiv)]
Ritesh Tiwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2010) 10 SCC 677 [Para 18(ii)]
Satya Pal Gopal Das v. Smt. Panchubala Dasi AIR 1985 SC 500 [Para 23(vii)]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.