1. Since the both the criminal revision cases are interconnected and the petitioner in both the petitions is one and the same, this common order is pronounced. 1. In the affidavits filed by the petitioner/Accused-22, in both the petitions, it is stated as follows:-

1.(a) The charges leveled against him by the respondent are for offences u/s.120B r/w Sec.420 IPC and Sec.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) P.C. Act, 1988, that even though the FIRs both from the F1, Chintadripet Police Station and the later by CBI contains 86 accused persons, the charge sheet was filed in 2008 was restricted to 21 persons only and several persons who are said to have played key roles as the very source of leakage were dropped for the reasons well known to the prosecution and as the attendance register for A.1 Duraimunisamy and A.2 Chinnathambi was admittedly tampered with by a blade, by the officials maintaining the attendance register who are shown as Lws and as a result even a hole is caused and found there and as the Forensic Experts certificate contradicts the statement of A.1 and A.2 said to have given statements voluntarily as how they climbed and gained entry into the DGP's chamber to remove the questio