S.PALANIVELU
D. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
D. Chairman – Respondent
1. The following are the averments contained in I.A.No.167/2010 filed in O.S.No.29 of 2007:
The 1st petitioner and the 1st respondent have prepared and signed two family arrangement dated 21.09.2000 and 29.09.2000 for some items of the suit properties in Rs.10/- stamp papers, in the presence of auspicious of the Karaikudi Varthaga Nadar Uravumurai, through its office bearers and hence the said transactions are not in the nature of conveyance in the present or in the future, that no right has been created or relinquished in the said documents, that the said documents are only the notes of past transaction between the parties but the same are objected to by the respondents that they are inadmissible in evidence, that the do not create or extinguish any right in the properties mentioned there by itself, that the same are admissible in evidence, that they are not hit by want of registration under Section 17 and 49 of the Registration Act and that if such records are not received into evidence, the petitioners would be put to loss and hardships and hence the same may be received and marked as Exhibits.
2. In the written statement filed by the defendants, it is averred as foll
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.