G.RAJASURIA
Rajamanickam – Appellant
Versus
P. Dhandapani – Respondent
1. This Second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 21.6.2010 passed by the Subordinate Court, Madurantakam, in A.S.No.40 of 2009 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.6.2009 passed by the District Munsif, Madurantakam, in O.S.No.175 of 2005, which was one for permanent injunction.
2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.
3. Compendiously and concisely the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this second appeal would run thus:
(a) The appellant herein, as plaintiff, filed the suit seeking the following reliefs:
"(i) Grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 5, their men, agents, and representatives from any way interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit 'A' schedule property and
(ii)Grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 5, their men, agents, and representatives from any way interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit 'B' schedule property and
(iii)To direct the defendants to pay the cost of the suit to the plaint."
(extra
R. Rathinavel Chettiar v. V. Sivaraman, (1999) 4 SCC 89
Thakur Singh v. A Achuta Rao (1977)2 APLJ 111);
Kedar Nath v. Chandra Kiran (AIR 1962 All 263);
Vidhydhar Dube v. Har Charan (AIR 1971 All 41);
Lala Chatram v. Krishnammal (1984) 1 MLJ 28;
Ram Dhan v. Jagat Prasad Sethi (AIR 1982 Raj 235).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.