R.SUBBIAH
G. Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore – Respondent
1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.1 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Chidambaram and to quash the same, in so far as the petitioner herein is concerned.
2. The petitioner herein has been arrayed as 3rd accused in C.C.No.1 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidambaram. The 2n drespondent herein / defacto-complainant had filed a complaint as against one Palanidesigan and six others, including the petitioner herein, for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 423, 465, 468, 471, 120(B) r/w 109 IPC. On the basis of the complaint given by the 2nd respondent / defacto-complainant, a case in Crime No.30 of 2012 was registered by the 1st respondent-Police. On completion of the investigation, the 1st respondent-Police has filed the charge-sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore and the same was taken on file as C.C.No.1 of 2013. Now, the petitioner/A3 has come forward with the present petition before this Court seeking to quash the charge-sheet.
3. It is the case of the prosecution that the property in Door Nos.30A, 30B, 30C situated in West Ca
(2009) 7 SCC 495 [Devendra and others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another]
(2009) 8 SCC 751 [Mohd.Ibrahim Vs. State of Bihar]
2010(5) CTC 438 [K.Srinivasan Vs. G.Kuppusamy Naidu Memorial Sport Trust]
(2011)7 SCC 616 [A.Subash Babu Vs. State of A.P.]
(2012) 10 SCC 155 [State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Surendra Kori]
(2012) 10 SCC 155 [State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Surendra Kori]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.