S.MANIKUMAR
Fiem Industries – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer Dharmapuri – Respondent
1. The petitioner-Factory is an Automobile Industry. It is the case of the petitioner that during 2012, the factory had an installed capacity of 1000 KVA by TANGEDCO. A new shed was put up for moulding unit and apart from that, a rest shed/training room was sought to be put up, for which, roofing was required, consisting of iron poles, which were welded at joints, over which, tin sheets were to be laid, so that, the workmen could rest in the covered area, adjoining to Shed No.2. Due to severe power shortage, the Industrial areas in Hosur were severely affected and they were allowed to use only 40% of the maximum demand. According to the petitioner, they could use 40% of the installed capacity. However, in order to augment supply of electricity and carry on the production activity, without any disruption, the petitioner had a captive generation. On account of addition of a Moulding Unit, the total usage of the power in the factory doubled from 1000 KVA to 2000 KVA. The petitioner had also purchased a new generation set, for which, cabling work was required. The new cabling was sought to be provided from the power house, by means of a metallic tray, which would support the c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.