C.T.SELVAM
Subramanian @ Ravi Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. The petitioner, who was treated as an approver in case pending trial in S.C.No.500 of 2005 on the file of learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, seeks his release on bail.
2. The prosecution case is that on 20.09.2002 at about 07.30 p.m., the de facto complainant was set upon and attacked by two persons wielding knives, within his residence. The de facto complainant suffered cut injuries to the right forearm at the hands of one of the assailants. The other caused bleeding injury to the left hand of the de facto complainant's wife. The domestic help of the de facto complainant has also suffered cut injuries at the hands of both assailants. The accused were charged for offences under Sections 120-B, 450, 326, 307 r/w 34 IPC. According to the prosecution, the first accused in the case sought a photograph of the de facto complainant from A3 and this petitioner having obtained such photograph from A3 had handed over the same to A5. Further, this petitioner had introduced A4 and A5 to A1.
3. The petitioner has been granted pardon under Section 306 Cr.P.C. by learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. He was examined before learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.