SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 626

High Court of Judicature at Madras
S. MANIKUMAR, J.
M/s. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Versus
Pavanesh & Another
C.M.A. No. 838 of 2014 & M.P. No. 1 of 2014
Decided On : 14-03-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Michael Visuvasam, Advocate.

The assessment of compensation for loss of future earning capacity should consider the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's earning capacity, and the tribunal should actively seek the truth to ensure just compensation.

Headnote:

Injury - Assessment of Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 163A - Section 168 - Section 169

Fact of the Case:

A cleaner sustained severe injuries in an accident and claimed compensation for loss of future earning capacity. The claims tribunal found that the respondent suffered permanent disablement affecting his future earning capacity and awarded compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the tribunal's decision, stating that the assessment of loss of future earning capacity was correct and the extent of disablement was justified based on the severity of the injuries.

Issues: Assessment of compensation for loss of future earning capacity, extent of disablement, and the adequacy of the treatment provided.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the assessment of loss of future earning capacity should consider the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's earning capacity. It also highlighted the need for active exploration and seeking of truth by the tribunal in assessing just compensation.

Final Decision: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed, and the appellant-Insurance Company was directed to deposit the entire award amount with proportionate accrued interest and costs to the credit of MCOP No.694 of 2010 on the file of MACT (Additional Special Judge), Krishnagiri.

Judgment

1. In an accident which occurred on 25.01.2010, a cleaner, aged about 45 years sustained fracture of 9 ribs in the right side of the rib cage. He sustained a communited fracture across end of right clavicle, linear fracture to inferior end of scapula, segmental outwardly displaced fracture of the squamous part of the right temporal bone extending to the mastoid part of the right temporal bone with pneumocephalus involving the right temporal lobe and suspicious fracture of the right nasal bone. He was initially treated in Government Hospital Bangarapet, as inpatient. Subsequently, he was shifted to R.L.Jalappa Hospital & Research Centre, attached to Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar. He was lateron admitted in NIMANS Hospital, Bangalore. After treatment in the said hospital, again, he was shifted to S.D.S. Tuberculosis & Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Chest Diseases Hosur Road, Bangalore and was treated as inpatient from 26.01.2010 to 17.02.2010. The contents of the CT Scan report of Thorax are as follows:

"A preliminary A.P. Scanogram of the Thorax was first made. Spiral Scans were then performed from the Thoracic inlet down to the low diaphragmatic levels, employing 6mm sections and a wide latitude in window settings. I.V. Contrast was administered using telebrix, coronal and 3 D reconstruction were also performed.

2. At the time of accident, he was 45 years and stated to have earned Rs.7,500/- per month, and contributed a substantial income to his wife and children. To prove that he has sustained grievous injuries, the 1st respondent/claimant has produced Ex.P3, discharge card issued by S.D.S. Tuberculosis & Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Chest Diseases Hosur Road, Bangalore and Ex.P4, wound certificate issued by the same institute. Medical bills and x-rays have been produced. PW2, Doctor, who clinically examined the 1st respondent/claimant has deposed that the claimant has sustained fracture in the ribs, and they were malunited by 1 degree, right clavicle fracture was malunited by 2 degrees and right scapula fracture was malunited by 1 degree. The Doctor has also opined that the 1st respondent/claimant cannot work as before, and assessed the disability at 60%. He has issued Ex.P8, Disability certificate. Considering the injuries, age, extent of disablement and also the malunited conditions of the fractured bones, the claims tribunal found that the respondent has suffered a permanent disablement, which would affect his loss of future earning capacity.

3. Copy of the discharge card produced by the learned counsel for the appellant Insurance company, shows that the 1st respondents/claimant was hospitalised between 26.01.2010 and 17.02.2010 for 22 days in S.D.S. Tuberculosis & Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Chest Diseases Hosur Road, Bangalore . The discharge card shows that there were fractures and the diagnosis, is as follows:

"fractures across multiple right sided ribs. Fracture communition of right clavicle. Linear fracture of inferior end of scapula. Right sided Haemo-pneumothroax. Pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphyseme. Homogenously enhancing solitary hepatic space occupying lesion is noted across segment IV."

4. At this juncture, this Court deems it fit to extract from the medical texts, as to what are the cases of malunion and non-union of bones and the treatment given by the Doctors.

“A malunion is a broken (fractured) bone that has healed in an unacceptable position that causes significant impairment. A nonunion is a fracture that has failed to heal after several months.

In malunion, the bone may have healed at a bent angle (angulated), may be rotated out of position, or the fractured ends may be overlapped causing bone shortening. Malunion may be caused by inadequate immobilization of the fracture, misalignment at the time of immobilization, or premature removal of the cast or other immobilizer. Nonunion has several causes. The broken ends of bone may be separated too much (overdistraction), which can occ
































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top