R.SUDHAKAR
Saroja – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) for the death of the son of the petitioner, viz., Rajendran.
2. Heard Mr.S.Umapathy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.V.Subbiah, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the first respondent and Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned Standing Counsel for Electricity Board, appearing for the second respondent.
3. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition it is stated that the deceased Mr.Rajendran, was a coolie engaged in civil construction work. He died due to electric shock, when he tried to save one Mr.Perumal and minor girl Shanmugapriya, who also suffered electrocution due to leakage of electricity from nearby electricity post at 10.00 am on 6.12.2005. It is also the case of the petitioner, the mother of the deceased, that the said Perumal also died in electrocution. FIR was also lodged in Crime No.3644 of 2005 in V-3 J.J. Nagar Police Station. The post-mortem report clearly states that the deceased Rajendran, died due to the electric shock. The death of the petitioner's son was caused due
AIR 2000 SC 988 : (2000) 2 SCC 465 (Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandima Das)
AIR 2001 SC 3668 : (2001) 8 SCC 151 (M.S.Grewal v. Deep Chand Sood)
2004 WLR 611 (DB) (The Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu v. Mrs.R.Selvam)
2009 (1) CTC 434 (Subramaniam v. State of Tamil Nadu)
2012 (2) CTC 848 (Ganesan v. The State of Tamil Nadu)
(2011) 1 MLJ 1329 (Thangapandi v. Director of Primary Health Services)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.