M. Sathyanarayanan, J.

1. The official respondents in W.P.No.3616/ 2011 are the appellants and aggrieved by the order dated 02.07.2012 made in the said writ petition, which was disposed of along with other writ petitions in a batch of cases, wherein order of suspension came to be passed against the first respondent herein/writ petitioner came to be set aside with a direction to the respondents in the writ petition that they are at liberty to post the writ petitioners in a far away place from the station of occurrence and post them in a non-sensitive post and if for any reason, the authorities are of the opinion that their continuance in service is a hindrance for the action initiated them, they can re-examine the issue and they are at liberty to take appropriate action, had filed this writ appeal.

2. The first respondent/writ petitioner joined the services of then Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), now Tamil Nadu Generation of Electricity and Distribution Company Limited (TANGEDCO) as Junior Engineer/Electrical Grade-II, vide order dated 28.03.1995 issued by the first appellant. According to him, every since from the date of his appointment, he has been discharging his