S.MANIKUMAR
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Harikrishnan – Respondent
S. Manikumar, J.
1. Respondent aged about 24 years, said to be an electrician sustained fractures in shaft of right femur and other injuries, treated as inpatient between 06.07.2011 and 17.08.2011 for 40 days. He has filed M.C.O.P. No. 4949 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (VI Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai, claiming compensation of Rs. 6,00,000/-. To prove that he has sustained multiple injuries and incurred expenses, the respondent has marked Exs.P2 and P8, discharge summaries issued by Government General Hospital, Chennai and Chengalpet, respectively, Ex.P3, X-ray, Ex.P7, photographs with CD, Ex.P11, disability certificate and Ex.P12, x-ray, taken at the time of assessment.
2. To prove that he was a qualified electrician, he has marked Ex.P4, order appointing him as an Electrician in Audco India Limited, Maraimalai Nagar. To prove that he was employed as an electrician in Audco India Limited, Maraimalai Nagar and earned Rs. 4,500/- per month, he has produced Ex.P4, appointment order, Ex.P5, identity card and Ex.P9, qualification certificate as wireman. But he has not examined the employer.
3. Insurance company though disputed the manne
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. C.K. Ramesh
C.K. Subramonia Iyer vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair
Arvind Kumar Mishra vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. 2010 (10) SCALE 298
Yadava Kumar vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. Reported in 2010 (10) SCC 341
R.D. Hattangadi vs. Pest Control (India) Ltd. 1995 (1) SCC 551 and Baker vs. Willoughby
Yadava Kumar vs. D.M. National Insurance Co. Ltd. 2010 (8) SCALE 567
B.T. Krishnappa vs.D.M. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Reported in 2010 ACJ 1971
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.