R.S.RAMANATHAN
P. Kumaran – Appellant
Versus
V. Ramaswami – Respondent
R.S. Ramanathan, J.
1. The first defendant in C.S.No.121 of 2007 is the applicant and the Application is filed to reject the plaint for non-disclosure of cause of action and lack of it.
2. The respondents 1 and 2 / plaintiffs filed the suit C.S.No.121 of 2007 for the following reliefs:-
“praying for a judgment and decree against the defendants directing the defendants to execute the sale deed conveying the plaint schedule property to the plaintiffs by receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.5,90,50,000/-” (Rs.1,50,000/- per cent for 4.27 acres giving credit to Rs.50,00,000/- received as advance by the defendants) and in the event of the defendants failing to execute the sale deed, the sale deed may be executed by this Hon'ble Court or by any Officer nominated or appointed by this Hon'ble Court and in the event of the decree for specific performance not being granted directing the defendants to pay a sum of Rs.1,30,00,000/-(Rs.50,00,000/-) paid as advance Rs.10,00,000/- received by the first defendant on 1.1.2006, Rs.25,00,000/- received by the first defendant on 29.4.2006 and Rs.45,00,000/- representing the cost of filling up the property with gravel) with 18% i
Nithayya Thevar v. Subramanian Ambalakarar [1970 (1) MLJ 400]
Rafiuddin Nuruddin Musalman v. Abduyl Karim Abdul Reheman and Ors. [2005(4) MhLj 646]
Jaswantrai Jethalal Vaidya v. Vimal [AIR 1963 GUJ 152]
Rama Rao and another v. Bashu Khan Saheb and two others [1998 (II) CTC 363]
Ramesh Hirachand Kundammal v. Municipal Corporation of greater Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.